ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed substantial burdens on clinicians and there is a need to better understand the impact on mental health and well-being. This scoping review investigates the prevalence of mental health concerns in anaesthetists, risk and protective factors for mental well-being, and anaesthetists' pandemic-related concerns and support. We searched online databases for articles published between January 2020 and May 2022, using search terms related to: anaesthesia; burnout, well-being, mental health or stress; and COVID-19. We identified 20 articles comprising 19 different populations of anaesthetists (n = 8680) from 14 countries. Studies identified the prevalence of the following condition in anaesthetists: burnout (14-59%); stress (50-71%); anxiety (11-74%); depression (12-67%); post-traumatic stress (17-25%); psychological distress (52%); and insomnia (17-61%). Significant risk factors for poorer mental health included: direct COVID-19-related issues (fear of self and family exposure to infection; requirement for quarantine); practitioner health factors (insomnia; comorbidities); psychosocial factors (loneliness; isolation; perceived lack of support at home and work); demographic factors (female gender; non-white ethnicity; LGBTQIA+); and workplace factors (redeployment outside area of clinical practice; increased work effort; personal protective equipment shortages). Protective factors identified included: job satisfaction; perceived organisational justice; older age; and male sex. Anaesthetists' self-reported concerns related to: personal protective equipment; resource allocation; fear of infection; fear of financial loss; increased workload; and effective communication of protocols for patient treatment. Support from family, colleagues and hospital management was identified as an important coping mechanism. Findings from this review may support the design of interventions to enhance anaesthetists' psychological health during pandemic conditions and beyond. Future research should include consistent psychological outcome measures and rigorous experimental design beyond cross-sectional studies.
ABSTRACT
Introduction The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in renewed emphasis on escalation decisions and discussions, often conducted by junior doctors without any training. Our local Foundation Year (FY) teaching does not address these topics. The distress caused by poor communication regarding escalation is well recognised. Our goal was to improve FY doctors’ confidence in this area and consequently improve quality of patient care. Method In PDSA cycle one, email questionnaires established a lack of confidence amongst FY1 doctors. This cycle resulted in the design of a one-hour workshop by middle-grade trainees interested in geriatrics or acute medicine. This workshop included an interactive teaching session, followed by demonstrative and participant role play. Feedback from the first workshop closed cycle two. In cycle three, a subsequent workshop was amended according to feedback. Workshop participants completed anonymous feedback, rating the impact on their confidence. Results Thirteen FY1 doctors responded positively to the initial questionnaire, with nine able to attend a workshop. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires asked respondents to rate their confidence from 1 (low) to 5 (high). Comparison demonstrated an increase in confidence making decisions from an average of 1.8 to 3.7 and discussing decisions with patients from 2 to 3.1. Qualitative feedback emphasised benefit from participant role play and the need for longer workshops. Conclusion Our project highlighted the need and desire for FY training in making and discussing escalation decisions. A one-hour workshop increased confidence in this group, though we acknowledge this is a surrogate marker of improved care. Workshop uptake was limited by a small local FY1 cohort, leave and clinical commitments. Though convenient, a one-hour session did not provide adequate time to realise full benefit. We hope to address these issues by integrating longer sessions into the protected teaching for all FY doctors in our health board.